zigzap/zap
blazingly fast backends in zig
Zap is the zig replacement for the REST APIs I used to write in python with Flask and mongodb, etc. It can be considered to be a microframework for web applications.
What I needed as a replacement was a blazingly fast and robust HTTP server that I could use with Zig, and I chose to wrap the superb evented networking C library facil.io. Zap wraps and patches facil.io - the C web application framework.
After having used ZAP in production for years, I can confidently assert that it proved to be:
zig-master
branch. Please note that the zig-master branch is not
the official master branch of ZAP. Be aware that I don't provide tagged
releases for it. If you know what you are doing, that shouldn't stop you
from using it with zig master though.zig build run-docserver
to serve them locally.-Dopenssl
flag or the environment variable ZAP_USE_OPENSSL=true
:.openssl = true,
(in dependent projects' build.zig,
b.dependency("zap" .{...})
)ZAP_USE_OPENSSL=true zig build https
zig build -Dopenssl=true https
I recommend checking out the new App-based or the Endpoint-based examples, as they reflect how I intended Zap to be used.
Most of the examples are super stripped down to only include what's necessary to show a feature.
To see API docs, run zig build run-docserver
. To specify a custom
port and docs dir: zig build docserver && zig-out/bin/docserver --port=8989 --docs=path/to/docs
.
See the other examples for specific uses of Zap.
Benefits of using zap.App
:
/slug
of the requested URL and provides a callback for each supported request method
(get, put, delete, options, post, head, patch).try
./users
endpoint for performing PUT/DELETE/GET/POST operations and listing
users, together with a simple frontend to play with. It also introduces a
/stop
endpoint that shuts down Zap, so memory leak detection can be
performed in main().GeneralPurposeAllocator
to report memory leaks when ZAP is shut down.
The StopEndpoint just stops ZAP when
receiving a request on the /stop
route.zap.Middleware.EndpointHandler
. Mixing endpoints
in your middleware chain allows for usage of Zap's authenticated endpoints and
your custom endpoints. Since Endpoints use a simpler API, you have to use
r.setUserContext()
and r.getUserContext()
with the request if you want to
access the middleware context from a wrapped endpoint. Since this mechanism
uses an *anyopaque
pointer underneath (to not break the Endpoint API), it is
less type-safe than zap.Middleware
's use of contexts.setUserContext()
and getUserContext()
, you can, of course use those two in
projects that don't use zap.Endpoint
or zap.Middleware
, too, if you
really, really, absolutely don't find another way to solve your context
problem. We recommend using a zap.Endpoint
inside of a struct that
can provide all the context you need instead. You get access to your
struct in the callbacks via the @fieldParentPtr()
trick that is used
extensively in Zap's examples, like the endpoint
example.zap.Router
to dispatch to handlers by HTTP path.r.sendError(err, status_code)
when you catch an error and a stack trace
will be returned to the client / browser.-Dopenssl=true
or the environment
variable ZAP_USE_OPENSSL
set to true
and requires openssl dev dependencies
(headers, lib) to be installed on the system.ZAP_USE_OPENSSL=true zig build run-https
OR like this: zig build -Dopenssl=true run-https
Claiming to be blazingly fast is the new black. At least, Zap doesn't slow you down and if your server performs poorly, it's probably not exactly Zap's fault. Zap relies on the facil.io framework and so it can't really claim any performance fame for itself. In this initial implementation of Zap, I didn't care about optimizations at all.
But, how fast is it? Being blazingly fast is relative. When compared with a simple GO HTTP server, a simple Zig Zap HTTP server performed really well on my machine (x86_64-linux):
So, being somewhere in the ballpark of basic GO performance, zig zap seems to be ... of reasonable performance 😎.
I can rest my case that developing ZAP was a good idea because it's faster than both alternatives: a) staying with Python, and b) creating a GO + Zig hybrid.
I used to have some micro-benchmarks in this repo, showing that Zap beat all the other things I tried, and eventually got tired of the meaningless discussions they provoked, the endless issues and PRs that followed, wanting me to add and maintain even more contestants, do more justice to beloved other frameworks, etc.
Case in point, even for me the micro-benchmarks became meaningless. They were just some rough indicator to me confirming that I didn't do anything terribly wrong to facil.io, and that facil.io proved to be a reasonable choice, also from a performance perspective.
However, none of the projects I use Zap for, ever even remotely resembled anything close to a static HTTP response micro-benchmark.
For my more CPU-heavy than IO-heavy use-cases, a thread-based microframework that's super robust is still my preferred choice, to this day.
Having said that, I would still love for other, pure-zig HTTP frameworks to eventually make Zap obsolete. Now, in 2025, the list of candidates is looking really promising.
ZAP is very robust. In fact, it is so robust that I was confidently able to only work with in-memory data (RAM) in all my ZAP projects so far: over 5 large online research experiments. No database, no file persistence, until I hit "save" at the end 😊.
So I was able to postpone my cunning data persistence strategy that's similar to a mark-and-sweep garbage collector and would only persist "dirty" data when traffic is low, in favor of getting stuff online more quickly. But even if implemented, such a persistence strategy is risky because when traffic is not low, it means the system is under (heavy) load. Would you confidently NOT save data when load is high and the data changes most frequently -> the potential data loss is maximized?
To answer that question, I just skipped it. I skipped saving any data until receiving a "save" signal via API. And it worked. ZAP just kept on zapping. When traffic calmed down or all experiment participants had finished, I hit "save" and went on analyzing the data.
Handling all errors does pay off after all. No hidden control flow, no hidden errors or exceptions is one of Zig's strengths.
To be honest: There are still pitfalls. E.g. if you request large stack sizes for worker threads, Zig won't like that and panic. So make sure you don't have local variables that require tens of megabytes of stack space.
See the StopEndpoint in the
endpoint example. The StopEndpoint
just stops ZAP when
receiving a request on the /stop
route. That example uses ZIG's awesome
GeneralPurposeAllocator
in main.zig to report
memory leaks when ZAP is shut down.
You can use the same strategy in your debug builds and tests to check if your code leaks memory.
Make sure you have zig 0.14.0 installed. Fetch it from here.
$ git clone https://github.com/zigzap/zap.git
$ cd zap
$ zig build run-hello
$ # open http://localhost:3000 in your browser
... and open http://localhost:3000 in your browser.
Make sure you have the latest zig release (0.14.0) installed. Fetch it from here.
If you don't have an existing zig project, create one like this:
$ mkdir zaptest && cd zaptest
$ zig init
With an existing Zig project, adding Zap to it is easy:
build.zig
In your zig project folder (where build.zig
is located), run:
zig fetch --save "git+https://github.com/zigzap/zap#v0.10.0"
Then, in your build.zig
's build
function, add the following before
b.installArtifact(exe)
:
const zap = b.dependency("zap", .{
.target = target,
.optimize = optimize,
.openssl = false, // set to true to enable TLS support
});
exe.root_module.addImport("zap", zap.module("zap"));
From then on, you can use the Zap package in your project via const zap = @import("zap");
. Check out the examples to see how to use Zap.
At the current time, I can only add to zap what I need for my personal and professional projects. While this happens blazingly fast, some if not all nice-to-have additions will have to wait. You are very welcome to help make the world a blazingly fast place by providing patches or pull requests, add documentation or examples, or interesting issues and bug reports - you'll know what to do when you receive your calling 👼.
We have our own ZAP discord server!!!
Being blazingly fast requires a constant feed of caffeine. I usually manage to provide that to myself for myself. However, to support keeping the juices flowing and putting a smile on my face and that warm and cozy feeling into my heart, you can always buy me a coffee ☕. All donations are welcomed 🙏 blazingly fast! That being said, just saying "hi" also works wonders with the smiles, warmth, and coziness 😊.
You build and run the examples via:
$ zig build [EXAMPLE]
$ ./zig-out/bin/[EXAMPLE]
... where [EXAMPLE]
is one of hello
, routes
, serve
, ... see the list of
examples above.
Example: building and running the hello example:
$ zig build hello
$ ./zig-out/bin/hello
To just run an example, like routes
, without generating an executable, run:
$ zig build run-[EXAMPLE]
Example: building and running the routes example:
$ zig build run-routes
const std = @import("std");
const zap = @import("zap");
fn on_request(r: zap.Request) void {
if (r.path) |the_path| {
std.debug.print("PATH: {s}\n", .{the_path});
}
if (r.query) |the_query| {
std.debug.print("QUERY: {s}\n", .{the_query});
}
r.sendBody("<html><body><h1>Hello from ZAP!!!</h1></body></html>") catch return;
}
pub fn main() !void {
var listener = zap.HttpListener.init(.{
.port = 3000,
.on_request = on_request,
.log = true,
});
try listener.listen();
std.debug.print("Listening on 0.0.0.0:3000\n", .{});
// start worker threads
zap.start(.{
.threads = 2,
.workers = 2,
});
}